Canara Bank 'CRISIL AAA/Stable' assigned to Infrastructure Bonds
Rating Action
& Originally issued by erstwhile Syndicate Bank Note: None of the Directors on CRISIL Ratings Limited’s Board are members of rating committee and thus do not participate in discussion or assignment of any ratings. The Board of Directors also does not discuss any ratings at its meetings. 1 crore = 10 million Refer to annexure for Details of Instruments & Bank Facilities |
Detailed Rationale CRISIL Ratings has assigned its ‘CRISIL AAA/Stable’ ratings to Rs 10000 Crore Infrastructure Bonds and reaffirmed its ratings on the existing debt instruments of Canara Bank at ‘CRISIL AAA/CRISIL AA+*/Stable/CRISIL A1+'.
CRISIL Ratings has also withdrawn its rating on Tier II bonds aggregating Rs 2500 crore (See ‘Annexure - Details of Rating Withdrawn' for details) in line with its withdrawal policy. CRISIL Ratings has received independent verification that these instruments are fully redeemed.
The ratings continue to reflect the expectation of strong support from the majority stakeholder, the Government of India, and the bank’s healthy market position. These strengths are partially offset by modest, albeit improving, asset quality and earnings profile.
The rating on the Tier I bonds (under Basel III) meets 'CRISIL’s rating criteria for BASEL III-compliant instruments of banks'. CRISIL Ratings evaluates the bank's (i) reserves position (adjusted for any medium-term stress in profitability) and (ii) cushion over regulatory minimum Common Equity Tier I (CET1; including capital conservation buffer [CCB]) capital ratios. Also evaluated is the demonstrated track record and management philosophy regarding maintenance of sufficient CET1 capital cushion above the minimum regulatory requirement. |
Analytical Approach CRISIL Ratings has combined the business and financial risk profiles of Canara Bank and its subsidiaries and associates. This is because of majority shareholding, business and financial linkages and shared brand. CRISIL Ratings has also factored in the strong support the bank is expected to receive from its majority shareholder, the Government of India, on an ongoing basis and in the event of distress.
Please refer Annexure - List of entities consolidated, which captures the list of entities considered and their analytical treatment of consolidation. |
Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description Strengths:
The ratings continue to factor in the expectation of strong government support, both on an ongoing basis and in the event of distress. This is because government is a majority shareholder in public sector banks (PSBs) and the guardian of India's financial system. While government shareholding declined to 62.93% as on September 30, 2023, from 78.55% as on September 30, 2020, after the Rs 2,000 crore qualified institutional placement (QIP) in December 2020 and Rs 2,500 crore QIP in August 2021, it still remains the majority shareholder. Stability of the banking sector is of prime importance to the government given its criticality to the economy, strong public perception of sovereign backing for PSBs and severe implications of any PSB failure in terms of political fallout, systemic stability and investor confidence. The majority ownership creates a moral obligation on the government to support PSBs, including Canara Bank.
Networth stood at Rs 86,954 crore as on March 31, 2024 (Rs 73,607 crore as on March 31, 2023), and is supported by internal accruals. CET 1, Tier-I capital adequacy ratio (CAR) and overall CAR stood at 11.6%, 14.0%, and 16.3%, respectively, on March 31, 2024 (11.6%, 13.8% and 16.7%, respectively, as on March 31, 2023).
Canara Bank is one of India's larger PSBs, with gross advances and deposits of Rs 9.6 lakh crore and Rs 13.1 lakh crore, respectively, as on March 31, 2024. The merger of Syndicate Bank had also strengthened the market position of Canara Bank. It had a market share of more than 6% in advances and deposits as on March 31, 2024. The bank has pan-India presence, with around 9,604 domestic branches and 10,209 automated teller machines (ATMs) across the country. It also has overseas branches at four locations. Revenue is diversified across businesses, products and geographies, thereby augmenting the strong overall market position. The bank has a robust franchise in the large and mid-sized corporate banking segments.
Weakness:
Asset quality, with gross non-performing assets (NPAs) of 4.2% as on March 31, 2024 (5.4% as on March 31, 2023 and 7.5% as on March 31, 2022) remains modest, albeit on an improving trend. The improvement over the years is driven both by lower slippages and high write-offs. The bank witnessed very high slippages in fiscals 2019 and 2020 at Rs 27,072 crore and Rs 24,107 crore, respectively. These were primarily from its large corporate exposure to companies in vulnerable sectors, such as iron and steel, infrastructure and construction, and finance. The micro and small enterprises exposure has also experienced elevated levels of stress. However over the last 2 fiscals, slippage ratio has been on an improving trend and stood at 2.0% in FY2023 and 1.6% in FY2024. Further, with the bank’s focus on recoveries, also supported by recoveries through the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code route, gross NPAs have seen an improving trend. The bank has written off a total of Rs 63,905 crore through fiscals 2019-2024, of which Rs 11,827 crore was written off in fiscal 2024. Gross NPAs from the corporate segment stood at around 4.4%, followed by MSMEs (8.5%), agriculture (3.4%) and retail (1.4%) as on March 31, 2024.
While earnings profile had been impacted over the last few fiscals because of high credit costs, it has improved since fiscal 2021. The bank has been reporting profits since fiscal 2021. It reported a profit after tax (PAT) of Rs 14,554 crore during fiscal 2024 (return on assets [RoA]) of 1.0%), against Rs 10,604 crore during fiscal 2023 (RoA of 0.8%).
Nevertheless, earnings profile remains constrained by lower proportion of current account savings account deposits impacting net interest margin and the pre-provisioning operating profit. Furthermore, provisioning coverage ratio (excluding technical write-offs) remains adequate at 70.9% as on March 31, 2024 (68.9% as on March 31, 2023, and 66.5% as on March 31, 2022).
CRISIL Ratings will continue to monitor the traction in asset quality and its consequent impact on profitability. |
Liquidity: Superior Liquidity continues to be superior, supported by a sizeable retail deposit base that forms a significant part of the total deposits. Liquidity coverage ratio was 129% for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, as against the regulatory requirement of 100%. The bank had excess statutory liquidity ratio of 6.58% of net demand and time liabilities (NDTL) as on March 31, 2023. Liquidity also benefits from access to systemic sources of funds, such as the liquidity adjustment facility from the RBI, access to the call money market and refinance limits from sources such as the National Housing Bank and National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.
ESG profile CRISIL Ratings believes the environment, social, and governance (ESG) profile of Canara Bank supports its already strong credit risk profile.
The ESG profile for financial sector entities typically factors in governance as a key differentiator. The sector has reasonable social impact because of its substantial employee and customer base and can play a key role in promoting financial inclusion. While the sector does not have direct adverse environmental impact, the lending decisions may have a bearing on the environment.
Canara Bank has an ongoing focus on strengthening the various aspects of its ESG profile.
Key ESG highlights of the bank:
There is growing importance of ESG among investors and lenders. The bank’s commitment to ESG will play a key role in enhancing stakeholder confidence, given shareholding by foreign portfolio investors and access to domestic capital markets. |
Outlook: Stable Canara Bank should continue to benefit from the strong government support and maintain a healthy market share. |
Rating Sensitivity factors Downward factors
|
About the Company Set up in 1906, Canara Bank is one of the larger PSBs. It made its initial public offering in 2002. As on September 30, 2023, government ownership in the bank stood at 62.93%.
Amalgamation of Syndicate Bank into Canara Bank was effective from April 1, 2020. The merged entity enjoys the benefits of a larger balance sheet, optimised capital utilisation, and wider geographic reach leading to deeper penetration. Domestic network comprises 9,518 branches and 10,553 ATMs. Additionally, it has international presence via three overseas branches (New York, London and Dubai).
Besides banking, it undertakes factoring, asset management, insurance and retail and institutional broking services through its subsidiaries and associates. |
Key Financial Indicators
|
Any other information: Not Applicable
Note on Tier II instruments (under Basel III) The distinguishing feature of tier II capital instruments under Basel III is the existence of the point of non-viability (PONV) trigger, the occurrence of which may result in loss of principal to the investors and hence, to default on the instrument by the issuer. According to the Basel III guidelines, the PONV trigger will be determined by RBI. CRISIL Ratings believes the PONV trigger is a remote possibility in the Indian context, given the robust regulatory and supervisory framework and systemic importance of the banking sector. The inherent risk associated with the PONV feature is adequately factored into the rating on the instrument.
Note on non-equity Tier 1 capital instruments (Under Basel III) The distinguishing features of non-equity tier I capital instruments (under Basel III) are the existence of coupon discretion at all times, high capital thresholds for likely coupon non-payment, and principal write-down (on breach of a pre-specified trigger). These features increase the risk attributes of non-equity tier I instruments over those of tier II instruments under Basel III, and capital instruments under Basel II. To factor in these risks, CRISIL Ratings notches down the rating on these instruments from the corporate credit rating of the bank.
The factors that could trigger a default event for non-equity tier I capital instruments (under Basel III), resulting in non-payment of coupon, are: i) the bank exercising coupon discretion; ii) inadequacy of eligible reserves to honor coupon payment if the bank reports a loss or low profit; or iii) the bank breaching the minimum regulatory CET I (including CCB) ratio. Moreover, given the additional risk attributes, the rating transition for non-equity tier I capital instruments (under Basel III) can potentially be higher and faster than that for tier II instruments. |
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument: |
Annexure - Details of Instrument(s)
^yet to be issued *Originally issued by erstwhile Syndicate Bank
Annexure - Details of Rating Withdrawn
|
Annexure – List of entities consolidated
|
| Annexure - Rating History for last 3 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All amounts are in Rs.Cr. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria Details
|